Gus Jae (gusjae@rcn.com)
Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:26:54 -0500


Don't forget, the suits at Bandai always have the final say on what they
think it should look like. Coming from a design background, I know. The
job of a designer is to produce a design suitable for the client, and in
this case, the client is Bandai, not us :(
For all we know, K probably wanted to do it a certain way and was met with
the "We would prefer" even though they have no design background. I have
done stuff that I will not include in my collection eventhough it was go
work, is just that the good design was met with the "voice" and now looks
like crap IMHO.
You know, I now kinda feel for K... poor guy.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richie" <gaijin@i-manila.com.ph>
To: <gundam@aeug.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [gundam] Katoki and HGUC

> > well, katoki is, imo, far more capable than okawara in
> > making a totally fictitious bogus thing as a giant
> > robot into a feasible machine. especially if you
> > compare the oldschool 0079 designs to, say, sentinel.
>
> It's a matter of age and influence. Katoki is more the engineer, and
> Okawara is more of an artist, it seems.
>
> > > it's probably because the HGUC is meant to be
> > > updates, not remakes. I
> > > suppose that's the limiting factor...
> > there are a handful of hguc's that are more than just
> > plain ol' updates. the gelgoog, the gp01, gp01fb,
> > shiki. as you said, they were either scaled down mg's
> > or mg prototypes.
> > that said, i do hope the hguc gm is a scaled down
> > version of the mg. the mg is preeeeeetty. :)
> > and i kinda liked the two piece skirt with codpiece.
> > :P a whole slab of skirt armor doesn't make too much
> > sense.
> > -garr
>
> It would, but it would have to be flexible nanotech....ugh.
>
>
>
> -
> Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Mar 04 2001 - 08:28:58 JST