edf91@att.net
Sun, 04 Feb 2001 04:23:35 +0000

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: AzNkId714@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] Gundam variations"
• Previous message: edf91@att.net: "Re: [gundam] MG GP03S!"
• Maybe in reply to: Doom4duke@aol.com: "[gundam] MG GP03S!"
• Next in thread: blazeeagle: "Re: [gundam] MG GP03S!"
• Next in thread: AzNkId714@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] MG GP03S!"

> Why could the GP03S not have a core fighter? it does
> seem posible doesn't it? it's really similar to the

Because from what I know, it's simply impossible to build a linear seat into a
corefighter. It's like asking for a fast hard drive for a laptop (I know not that many
people will get this example, but it's the best I can think of at the moment...)

> GP01, which had a core fighter. or maybe not.

GP02 is in the same series, and it doesn't have a corefighter. The "supposed" GP04
don't have core fighter either, so any MS in the GP series don't have to have a
corefighter...

--
-Edmund Chiu
edf91@worldnet.att.net
-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

• Next message: AzNkId714@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] Gundam variations"
• Previous message: edf91@att.net: "Re: [gundam] MG GP03S!"
• Maybe in reply to: Doom4duke@aol.com: "[gundam] MG GP03S!"
• Next in thread: blazeeagle: "Re: [gundam] MG GP03S!"
• Next in thread: AzNkId714@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] MG GP03S!"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Feb 04 2001 - 13:23:38 JST