Mark Simmons (email@example.com)
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:31:19 -0800
>Hmm, this is quite a nit I'm picking here, but...
>My impression is that both Tivvay and Chivvay were trying to represent the
>same thing in Japanese... using 'te' plus small 'i' had become more
>acceptable to represent the foreign 'ti' in subsequent years, supplanting
>the usage of 'chi' for the same purpose. To my mind the only real difference
>is that one came out in '79 and one about ten years later... in the interim,
>the overall phonological climate became more permissive of the 'te-i'
Quite likely so, but that doesn't necessarily mean they'd retcon the
old spelling. And for that matter, the kana they use for the classic
Chivvay hasn't changed - it's still written "chibe", as distinct from the
0080 version. So whatever the reason for the different spelling in 0080,
it created a distinction that's been faithfully preserved in subsequent
publications, including the Shindosha timeline (which lists different
design dates for the two types of ship).
>Mark, is the difference just your preference, or is it laid out in the
>'spelling' document for First Gundam that you frequently reference?
Nah, the First Gundam spelling lists only cover the movies and TV
series. I don't think Sunrise has devoted a similar amount of scrutiny to
the other UC series yet...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Simmons / firstname.lastname@example.org / http://www.gundamproject.com/
"If you can kill it, it's not a god, just a good old-fashioned monster."
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Jan 11 2001 - 05:32:22 JST