Nicholas Paufler (email@example.com)
Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:53:45 -0800
Okay, now you're just arguing for arguments sake.
We've point out numerous photographic and documented references from
official sources saying that its a beam rifle. Bandai says thats what it is,
end of story. They made the bloody thing, so _of course_ what they say goes.
We've yet to come up with any evidence supporting your theory other than
that you think it looks like a shell firing weapon. Big whoop. All kinds of
different designers have given their take on MS designs and they all do
things differently, a fact we've repeatedly pointed out.
This is getting highly pointless.
--- Nicholas "Echo|Fox" Paufler http://www.wingzero.net - Home of the High Quality Gundam Image Archive "Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard. Be evil." "Hail Eris. All hail Discordia!"
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gundam EZEight" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <email@example.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 8:41 PM Subject: Re: [gundam] Alex's weapons
> a picture is not good enough! what is this a > conspiracy? no one else has the 1/144 Alex by Bandai? > under the alleged beam rifle is the actual beam rifle > it self. > > does everyone here believe everything Bandai or > "official reference" tell you? think about it for a > second! the rifle looks like a shell firing rifle. > every single beam rifle i've come across does not look > like that. the e-pac are more streamlined in all the > other beam rifles. the "e-pac" on the alex's rifle > seems like it can pack lead rather than heat. think > about it. they're not always right. this is one i > think they really dropped the ball on. >
- Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Dec 27 2000 - 13:52:58 JST