Richie Ramos (
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:28:10 +0800

> >*makes unintelligible animal sounds*
> Kicks Garrick - "Tarzen check bee".

hey, don't do that to Garrick!

<STOMPS Garrick>

> They were much better than the MG Mk-II's side skirt
> plates, that's for sure.

Dear God, yes I agree....I've already modified one of my MKII's to have no
side skirts...

> >found the cogs in the zaku head a
> >little too unwieldy (i.e. they don't work :P).
> The gears tend to "fray", there's just no way to fix
> that problem unless you can cast the same parts out
> of hard metal. Haven't started on my MG Gouf kit,
> dunno if they fixed that problem with a new design
> like, say, the MG Dom's monoeye system.

The MG dom's system is basically the optical rod on a polycap ball joint
(used for the neck in smaller kits). you have to position it by hand.

> >attaching the foot to lower leg was like...hell, it
> >was like doing a mr. bean act -- driving a car while
> >putting on your clothes and brushing your teeth.
> >overall, pretty ok model. solid but kinda limited
> >flexibility.
> >-garr

But it was good looking, neh? That's what UI liked about it, it was a
decent version of a basically weird design.

> Can't expect much from a kit designed over 5 years ago.
> I am pretty sure Bandai will pull a version 1.5 with
> the MG Zaku II soon, using the MG Gouf's body as a
> starting point. As if people in Japan haven't started
> on that already, hehehe, the MG Gouf kit will soon
> become a best seller once Zaku-heads start getting
> "raw parts" for their projects.
> Eddie

Actually, that's one of my reasons for wanting to acquire Two GOUFs.

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Dec 14 2000 - 11:51:31 JST