Richie Ramos (email@example.com)
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:28:10 +0800
> >*makes unintelligible animal sounds*
> Kicks Garrick - "Tarzen check bee".
hey, don't do that to Garrick!
> They were much better than the MG Mk-II's side skirt
> plates, that's for sure.
Dear God, yes I agree....I've already modified one of my MKII's to have no
> >found the cogs in the zaku head a
> >little too unwieldy (i.e. they don't work :P).
> The gears tend to "fray", there's just no way to fix
> that problem unless you can cast the same parts out
> of hard metal. Haven't started on my MG Gouf kit,
> dunno if they fixed that problem with a new design
> like, say, the MG Dom's monoeye system.
The MG dom's system is basically the optical rod on a polycap ball joint
(used for the neck in smaller kits). you have to position it by hand.
> >attaching the foot to lower leg was like...hell, it
> >was like doing a mr. bean act -- driving a car while
> >putting on your clothes and brushing your teeth.
> >overall, pretty ok model. solid but kinda limited
But it was good looking, neh? That's what UI liked about it, it was a
decent version of a basically weird design.
> Can't expect much from a kit designed over 5 years ago.
> I am pretty sure Bandai will pull a version 1.5 with
> the MG Zaku II soon, using the MG Gouf's body as a
> starting point. As if people in Japan haven't started
> on that already, hehehe, the MG Gouf kit will soon
> become a best seller once Zaku-heads start getting
> "raw parts" for their projects.
Actually, that's one of my reasons for wanting to acquire Two GOUFs.
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Dec 14 2000 - 11:51:31 JST