brandon perlow (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:10:21 -0800
Peter Carranza wrote:
> In space, wouldn't a Ball be more efficient than an MS? Esp. if it had 360
> degree cameras and verniers? Is a humanoid shape functional in space? For
> that matter, why should space fighters resemble the atmospheric aerodynamic
> cockpit/fuselage/wing jets? There is no friction in the vacuum of space.
Well theres something to be said for aerodynamics if the spacecraft has to go
transatmospheric ocasionnally.. ... Allso I would think more streamlined shapes could
have better heat distribution...
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Nov 29 2000 - 18:56:27 JST