brandon perlow (
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:10:21 -0800

Peter Carranza wrote:

> In space, wouldn't a Ball be more efficient than an MS? Esp. if it had 360
> degree cameras and verniers? Is a humanoid shape functional in space? For
> that matter, why should space fighters resemble the atmospheric aerodynamic
> cockpit/fuselage/wing jets? There is no friction in the vacuum of space.

Well theres something to be said for aerodynamics if the spacecraft has to go
transatmospheric ocasionnally.. ... Allso I would think more streamlined shapes could
have better heat distribution...

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Nov 29 2000 - 18:56:27 JST