Peter Carranza (email@example.com)
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 01:26:38 -0800
In space, wouldn't a Ball be more efficient than an MS? Esp. if it had 360
degree cameras and verniers? Is a humanoid shape functional in space? For
that matter, why should space fighters resemble the atmospheric aerodynamic
cockpit/fuselage/wing jets? There is no friction in the vacuum of space.
>From: "Wiseman" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>To: "gundam" <email@example.com>
>Subject: [gundam] OT: how a true spacecraft would look like?
>Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:37:38 +0100
>What an emotion! This is the first thread I start... ^__^
>I just wondered: how a true war starship would look like...
>For instance, I assume armour would be senseless, due to relativistic
>velocities of the shells; and where should be the vernier thrusters? And
>what kind of weapons should it have?
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Nov 29 2000 - 18:10:37 JST