 |
 |
||||
|
|
||||
Edmund Chiu (edf91@worldnet.att.net)
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 09:57:51 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zhou Tai An" <kain@pacific.net.sg>
To: <gundam@aeug.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [gundam] Role of Warships in UC: Was: I-Fields..
> Well, there are advantages and disadvantages to both sides...I think we
> prefer Japanese games for this argument because I believe that since they
> draw on the original source material, they are better gauges of how
> realistic things in Gundam are.
And they have access to Emotion's staff - do the board game makers here
have access to the same people?
> Play the game. Then you'll know what we're talking about. ^_^
Translation - unless you have a really good dodging MS like Quebeley,
you are bound to get hit a few times in the process, which means you usually
lose a few units here and there before you get close enough to use beam
saber...
> I refer you back to my analogy of the gun and sword - centuries of
> close-combat refinement went down the drain when the gun was invented.
Which
> is what I think MSes are to the Gundam world; the new guns.
More like planes...
-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Nov 16 2000 - 02:33:20 JST