 |
 |
||||
|
|
||||
Franz Co (ms_slasher@mail.com)
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 00:36:07 -0500 (EST)
>------Original Message------
>From: "WooJin" <bj90662@binghamton.edu>
>To: <gundam@aeug.org>
>Sent: November 2, 2000 5:28:33 PM GMT
>Subject: Re: [gundam] I-Fields..
One would also notice that ship development is far behind MS development.
The Lar Kailum class first seen in CCA was still in use up to UC 153.
>>
> But F91 ships did not have the same I-Field technology built into
> them, which is surprising. If generators small enough to be used reliably
on
> MSes had been developed, it would have been a simple matter to incorporate
> the devices in key areas on the ship -- again, bridge and engines
primarily.
>Beam Shields are a pretty new technology back when F91 was >made, and in
>series follow F91, including Crossbone Gundam and Victory, we >see Capital
>Ships emplying large beam shields in front the ship to help >shield it from
>most head on attacks.
This makes sense especially if you face of head to had with the enemy in
front of you most of the time.
>This makes the ships sill vulnerable to attacks from all other >angles but
I
>some how get the feeling that something as massive as a I-beam >barrier
would
>be a bit out of practical uses.
And any mobile suits trying to get through would have to go thru a mobile
suit screen as well as a wal of fire making life dificult for the MS pilots.
-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Nov 05 2000 - 14:21:49 JST