Brandon Perlow (nurbs@pacbell.net)
Sun, 01 Oct 2000 11:29:05 +0100


Ill have to agree with James.. The redo totally ruins Izubuchis orginal design..
Bandai was definately cost cutting to reuse pieces for its Gms... The
proportions are totally off too...
"James E. \"ZEE\" Doyle" wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 04:10:31 GMT, gundam@aeug.org wrote:
>
> > WHA???? Why do you feel that the Alex is overrated? I thought that the
> kit
> > was great to build and it holds up nicely. Plus I love pretty much all of
>
> > the mech from 0080.
>
> I'm gonna have to go with the"overrated" mark here too. While the ALEX is
> one of my favorite GUNDAMS bar none, and I'm thrilled to finally have it in
> 1/100 scale. I find I just can't look too closely at it. It's like if your
> kid is ugly, or you know your candidate is crooked. There are just too many
> weird little inconsistencies in the sculpt of this kit, and too many
> construction bugaboos overall, especially in the legs and backpack. The kit
> as a whole lacks the refinement seen in the better MG's, and its problems
> promise to be fairly challenging to correct. Coming right on the heels of
> the fabulous DOM, I found it disappointing.
>
> Still, the basic looks of the kit are pretty good. Viewed on a shelf from a
> comfortable distance, it looks just fine. And it rocks all over the putrid
> 1/144 effort. Now if we can just get an HGUC out of it...
>
> J.E.D.
>
> ---
>
> Nobody's family can hang out the sign
> "Nothing's the matter here".
>
> -Chinese proverb
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Say Bye to Slow Internet!
> http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
>
> -
> Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:17:37 JST