jose luis manalansan 4 (nerv@teammail.com)
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:48:54 +0800


Were the Gundams in the UC really as durable as those in the AC? I have
to agree on that part about G 8>(Tequilla Gundam anyone?)

-----Original Message-----
From: "Chris Maier" <oom9@crosswinds.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:19:13 -0400
Subject: Defending Gundam Wing was RE: [gundam] 3 series' confirmed.

> Support TEAMMAIL. Be a Panelist in our Surveys. Email to
> TEAMWORK@teammail.com
>
> Yeah, but the thing is that Power Rangers/Voltron/etc. didn't have
> heavy
> political agendas and suicidal, depressed protagonists.
> Also, I've never seen the Gundams as 'nigh-indestructible' as you
> put it.
> Most of the Gundams are destroyed through the series, and get
> replaced and
> or modified later on. I don't see how this is different from other
> Gundams.
> RX-78-2 was pretty powerful and lasted quite a long time without
> incurring
> overly heavy damage, and Zeta Gundam and the Mark II lasted two
> freaking
> series without suffering too much damage. But the Gundams in Wing are
> often
> destroyed, and are really no more vulnerable than the UC Gundams.
> Also we
> have the designs-Remove the buster rifle and the Wing Gundam/Wing
> Gundam
> Zero could probbly fit right into UC continuity. Of course the other
> Gundams
> may not look as 'real' but if you're going to pick on ridicoulous
> mecha
> designs, check out G Gundam instead.

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Sep 12 2000 - 22:37:27 JST