Zhao Pan (zhaopan@hotmail.com)
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 20:44:45 EDT

The new HGUC have some of some of the best Non-MG and Non-PG villains, such
as the Zaku III custom, Quebley Mk II, and Gouf. They are truly remarkable
and should be in every Gundam fan's collection.

The next HGs I would like to see is the RX-79(G) and Sazabi. But the
possiblity will be slim because they already have the MG versions. Also old
kits like Gerbera Tetra, Gelgoog, Kampfer, and Rick Dom II should definitely
getting some makeovers.

The next HG will be the Rx-78 GP01. It looks very similar to the MG version
but lacks some of its details such as separate knee pads and open hatches.
Also the proportion is a little off from what I see in the preview: Bulkier
body and shorter upper legs. It sells for $18.00.
Anyone interested?

>From: nurbs <nurbs@pacbell.net>
>Reply-To: gundam@aeug.org
>To: "gundam@aeug.org" <gundam@aeug.org>
>Subject: [gundam] gundam model kit rants..
>Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 15:18:15 +0100
>Im going to go on my soapbox for a bit... Ive just been assembling some
>of my MG kits, the NT-1 and the Gelgoog... I really wish they made the
>Jaeger version of the gelgoog! its probably been harped on before , but
>Im going to reiterate it!! What were they thinking about doing the old
>one! Give me some Jaeger! Looks like Ill be figuring out how to cut
>plastic for this one. My other gripe. The NT-1.. Was this katoki's
>version? If so they really did not capture the subtlies and proportions
>of Izubuchis design! I really can tell they kit bashed this with the GM
>and previous gundam kits...I find the lines on this kit are way too
>SHARP. The NT-1 should have a resemblence to the NU, since they were
>designed around the same time and by the same designers(I think). Looks
>like Im ging to have to file and sand.. I m still waitng for my sazabi,
>but it looks from photos to be a little too angular in some places..
>Looks like Ill be putting that one too.. Can any of you master modelers
>on the page give a good tutorial or limk to show proper "bodywork"
>techiques"?? I would really like to learn how to fix the problems in
>these kits!
>Also , am I just crazy, but I want to see the return of HG 1/100 kits!
>I would rather pay half price just to get a decent sculpt of the
>character and joint details, then pay for the internals which I never
>show anyway. I feel some of the proportions and posabitly are sacrificed
>for internals(notably the midsection of th eGelgoog! its way more
>posable without the armor!). Dont get me wrong I love that for the PGs,
>but I think bandai should reconsider the HG line for the lesser known or
>unique designs. I love to see a 1/100 HG of the Bawoo(bigger version of
>the upcoming 1/144),. Psycho Gundam2 1/100(why not, It could be the
>quality of the and size of the 1/60 G or WingZero, and Id be happy!).
>They should consider making 1/60s of the tallgeese, epyon and
>deathscythe. With computer technologies, it wouldnt be hard for them to
>"scale up" the current kits . I wouldnt mind paying 60 or 80 bucks for
>just a sized up 1/100 to 1/60 retool of the NU. It was a pretty good
>sculpt to begin with and would look great towering over the other PGS!!
>I think Bandai made a mistake giving the Sazabi the "MG' treatment. I
>would have rather seen a them just keep the decent external sculpt, and
>skip the internals of it, and just charge 40 - 50 bucks, and have a
>smaller box! I say bandai should go back to basics, and release more
>larger HGs , make 1/100s of there current HGUcs, and release less MGs
>and PGs. It hink it would be better and more profitable for them to do
>this. The larger scale kits just look nicer, and the simplicity and good
>sculpts of the 1/144 would carry over quite well(Id love a 1/100 HG
>type100 and zaku3!!).
>Id love to hear your views...
>Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Aug 11 2000 - 03:48:44 JST