MS06ZAK@aol.com
Wed Jun 21 11:55:15 2000

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Blackeagle: "Re: [gundam] Medical Technology"
• Previous message: Brett Jensen: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"
• In reply to: MS06ZAK@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"
• Next in thread: Edward Ju: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"
• Next in thread: BlazeEagle@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"

In a message dated Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:35:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Brett Jensen <heero@earthlink.net> writes:

<<

MS06ZAK@aol.com wrote:

> but wasn't the point of the HGUC line to make kits that would never be MG?
> But now that they have the GP-01 coming that shoots that idea down. It would
> be nice. Personally I think that 1/100 MG Marine Mecha (Gog, Z'Gock,etc.)
> would be really awesome if done correctly.

As much as I like the 0079 Gog and Zugock, I'd much rather see the 0080 variants.

---Brett Jensen

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
>>

I do agree on that one. It would be cool if they did the Zugock E and actually put in all of the interesting underwater apparatus parts inside of the kit.

Jason

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

• Next message: Blackeagle: "Re: [gundam] Medical Technology"
• Previous message: Brett Jensen: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"
• In reply to: MS06ZAK@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"
• Next in thread: Edward Ju: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"
• Next in thread: BlazeEagle@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] How come no MG Guncannon and Guntank, yet?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Jun 22 2000 - 00:55:18 JST