Eiji Hayashi (mirage_left4@hotmail.com)
Fri, 19 May 2000 21:09:33 GMT

>From: Freedom045@aol.com
>Reply-To: gundam@aeug.org
>To: gundam@aeug.org
>CC: mdvannorman@earthlink.net
>Subject: [gundam] It's CHAR, not SHA!
>Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:30:47 EDT
>In 99% of the fan references I have seen, the main nemesis of the Gundam
>Saga is ALWAYS: CHAR Aznable
>Every reference I have seen come out of Japan is "CHAR". I don't know where
>they find people (who always find their way into doing the official
>translations) who insist that is must be "Sha". (Take THAT Fred Schodt!)

yup.. if he didn't bring it up.. 100% of the Gundam fandom would know it as
Char. That twit!

>I don't get it.
>I can understand there are always differences as to how some characters
>names come out different to different people (Bright Noah, Brite Noa), but
>in this case, I think it important that such an important character's name
>be firmly established.
>I don't want to pick up a copy of "Sha's Counterattack", I want "CHAR'S
>When you get down to it, I just simply feel that "Sha" just seems wimpy and
>lame when compared to "Char".
>Anyone else agree, or disagree?

I concur.. even though "Sha" is closer to the actual Japanese sound, there's
not much to be said when Bandai itself uses the initials CA to describe Char
and not SA, eg: the red Zaku in Giren's Ambition is given the prefix
MS-06S-CA.. not SA. But this is even besides the main point that Sha simply
sounds too wimpy compare to Char.. that it doesn't fit his cool and imposing

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat May 20 2000 - 06:03:20 JST