Char Aznable (charaznable@excite.com)
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT)


On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 06:59:34 -1000, gundam@aeug.org wrote:

> Aaron,
> I realize that there was an "OT" on the message. That doesn't mean the
> thread has to go beyond the "beating the dead horse" stage. Just because
> the "OT" status is invoked, it doesn't mean post with impunity, OT should
> be used sparingly IMO.
>
> Okay, now I'm done, let's get back to Gundam. :)

I just want to voice out my support for this statement. if there is
something OT, we should limit it even if there's an 'OT' on the subject.

_______________________________________________________
Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Apr 25 2000 - 11:33:55 JST