: Re: [gundam] Re: What will it be, since Turn A combines all Gundam Was: Re: [...

		Find this:

Brett Jensen (heero@earthlink.net)
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:16:03 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: David \: "Re: [gundam] [OT?] Dear God, Does That Mean That Camile Isn't As Screwed Up As We Thought He Was?"
Previous message: Enriquez, Eric: "[gundam] Ep. guide for ZZ and 8th MS"
Next in thread: Mark Simmons: "Re: [gundam] Re: What will it be, since Turn A combines all Gundam Was: Re: [..."

Roland Thigpen wrote:

Detailed comparison snipped

Wow, Glad I didn't write my own comparison before seeing your message ^_^

> It's got some differences, but it is as much a rehash of the original Gundam as Macross II: Lover's Again was of the original Macross.

Good analogy. Like Macross II, Gundam F91 had some really cool parts, and some incredibly stupid parts.

---Brett Jensen

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

Next message: David \: "Re: [gundam] [OT?] Dear God, Does That Mean That Camile Isn't As Screwed Up As We Thought He Was?"
Previous message: Enriquez, Eric: "[gundam] Ep. guide for ZZ and 8th MS"
Next in thread: Mark Simmons: "Re: [gundam] Re: What will it be, since Turn A combines all Gundam Was: Re: [..."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Mar 11 2000 - 04:21:39 JST