Vincent Valentine (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 02 Feb 2000 02:40:00 +0800
> > One reason you're getting so many different answers to your question is
> that your definition of the term "mecha" is different from Japanese
> speakers' definition.
Fascinating! I see. So, in this sense, Gatchaman *would* be mecha.
> To Japanese speakers, "mecha" is anything mechanical, period. It does not
> mean advanced combat humanoid vehicles only. It can be advanced or
> primitive, combat or civilian, humanoid or non-humanoid, and Japanese or
> otherwise. Laputa's flaptors, Mach Go! Go! Go!/Speed Racer's Mach 5,
> Yamato/Star Blazers' Yamato -- they're *all* considered mecha.
Thanks for the info! What about things like the the Bts in BT'X, or the ultra-technical armored suits in Saint Seiya. Do you think Japanese classifications would call these mecha?
> [Oh, hi folks again. ^^ Hopefully I can catch up with my e-mail and ML
> replies this weekend. Well, hopefully. ^^;]>>
Nice to meet you!
Get your free email from http://www.yyhmail.com
powered by OutBlaze
- Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Feb 02 2000 - 03:41:43 JST