: Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!

		Find this:

Mark Simmons (scorpio@best.com)
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:46:14 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Edward Ju: "Re: [gundam] GWing Models in Chicago"
Next message: Paul Fields: "Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!"
Previous message: BlazeEagle@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] GWing Models in Chicago"
Maybe in reply to: MS06ZAK@aol.com: "[gundam] GWing Models in Chicago"
Next in thread: Neil Baumgardner: "Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!"
Next in thread: Paul Fields: "Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!"

Neil writes,

> Just got a response from Tsuneo Tateno on RGT's Mekton BBS, re: Jan. 1
> vs 13 for end of the OYW.

I followed up there. I didn't realize he was referring to the treaty
signing as being January 13, not the Battle of A Bao A Qu. His reasoning re:
the mysterious newspaper photo at the end of 0080 is as good as any other
I've seen...

-- Mark

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

Next message: Edward Ju: "Re: [gundam] GWing Models in Chicago"
Next message: Paul Fields: "Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!"
Previous message: BlazeEagle@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] GWing Models in Chicago"
Maybe in reply to: MS06ZAK@aol.com: "[gundam] GWing Models in Chicago"
Next in thread: Neil Baumgardner: "Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!"
Next in thread: Paul Fields: "Re: [gundam] Well, its Jan. 13 now!"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Dec 24 1999 - 04:48:44 JST