Mark Simmons (
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 20:54:32 -0800

Eiji Hayashi writes, regarding the classification of the MSZ-007 as a Gundam,

>that makes absolutely no sense to me.

  <shrug> It's a simple and consistent rule.

>I don't recall ever reading about there being more than one MSZ-006D. The
>Model Graphix issue I read, "Around the Zeta Plus World", indicate there is
>only one D model.

  Which issue are you referring to? "Around the Z Plus World" was a
multi-parter, and none of the installments I have mention how many were
produced. The only comments I've seen regarding its production are in the
big Gundam Wars book, which as I already said indicates that several were
produced in multiple batches.

>The Z is psychomu test prototypes, it is not indicative of what the Zaku II
>should be, but is rather, an experiment with the clear purpose to produce

  Exactly. And since there are officially dozens of Z Pluses in
circulation already, any unique prototypes in the family (like the A3)
could easily be mockups for future mobile suits (in this case, the D
type). This doesn't mean that the _base_ machine isn't a mass-produced model.

>The MS-06R-2 is nothing more than a MS-06R1, which is a mass production MS,
>painted in red then given to Johnny Raiden.

  Not quite. The R-2's genealogy is much more complicated - see the MS
Classics features on my site for the gory details. It's actually of the
same type as the MSZ-007 and Re-GZ - a trial unit of a canceled
mass-production mobile suit.

>In any case the factor of mass production is irrelevent, since you readily
>admit that even mass produced version of Gundam, as long as it has the word
>"Gundam" in its name somewhere, is reason enough to consider it a Gundam.

  That's right. We're just carrying on a digression about the quantity of
Z Pluses out there. It wouldn't affect my classification whether they
made 2 or 200. :-)

>I think a much better classification method would be to look at the model
>number. At the most basic, any MS which has the same basic model series as a
>prototype Gundam, should be considered a Gundam. Just look at all the RX-78.

  That's an interesting method. It's certainly a bit more scientific than
"I know it when I see it." :-)

>One may even go as far as
>consider every MS with the MSZ prefix to be Gundams.

  I dunno about that. The purpose of Anaheim's Project Z wasn't to
produce Gundams per se. And Anaheim produced Gundams outside of Project Z
(e.g. the Gundam Mark III, Superior Gundam, Epsy Gundam...).

>BTW Mark.. as for your objection of the FAZZ being a Gundam because there
>isn't the word "Gundam" in it. I quote Entertainment Bible...
>"FAZZ is the abbreviation for Full Armor ZZ GUNDAM".

  Sure, just like Re-GZ is an abbreviation for "Refined Gundam Z."
Neither are Gundams by my oh-so-simple definition.

-- Mark

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Seek Mark Simmons at <> or <>

Goriki has an intelligence and grace lacking in all other megamatons!
Plus, the power to stop steam trains! Goriki is ART!

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Nov 23 1999 - 14:00:02 JST