Federico Makabenta (yenm@iconn.com.ph)
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 20:26:09 +0800

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Ben.Mack@jwt.com: "Re: [gundam] Bandai-Mattel alliance"
• Previous message: MS06ZAK@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] master vs. perfect"
• Maybe in reply to: Ben.Mack@jwt.com: "[gundam] master vs. perfect"
• Next in thread: Paul Fields: "Re: [gundam] master vs. perfect"

----- Original Message -----
From: <MS06ZAK@aol.com>
To: <gundam@aeug.org>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [gundam] master vs. perfect

> In a message dated 11/14/99 10:42:11 PM Central Standard Time,
> yenm@iconn.com.ph writes:
>
> << Anyway, just in case you had an intention to buy a PG Gundam - it's
still a
> good kit though... but I wouldn't hold it up to any MG Gundam in terms of
> quality...
> >>
> what do you mean? I would have to say the PG has way more quality then
> almost any of the MG gundams out there, especially the MG Rx-78-2 which
was,
> to be honest, a turd burglar IMHO.

Sorry my mistake - I meant the PG Evangelion in that sentence. True - the MG
Rx78-2 wasn't all it cracked up to be. I liked the transparent one better...

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/

• Next message: Ben.Mack@jwt.com: "Re: [gundam] Bandai-Mattel alliance"
• Previous message: MS06ZAK@aol.com: "Re: [gundam] master vs. perfect"
• Maybe in reply to: Ben.Mack@jwt.com: "[gundam] master vs. perfect"
• Next in thread: Paul Fields: "Re: [gundam] master vs. perfect"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Nov 15 1999 - 21:36:34 JST