Tomonaga (
Wed, 27 Oct 1999 11:07:03 +1300

reika wrote:

> Well I was wondering where you got some of this
> information from, so I decided to flip thru my MS
> Encyclopaedia, and there is a little bit written
> about the ReGZ which I decided to get Translingo
> to translate for what it translates into
> (excuse grammatical errors)...if anyone would like
> the original Japanese text, email me and I will
> send to you.
> translation start --
> Experimental Mobile Suits which Anaheim company
> developed. The name of this machine is an
> abbreviation name of "Refinement Gundam Zeta", and
> the airframe made for trial purposes for the mass
> production of the MSZ-006Z Gundam. Therefore,
> Back Weapon System which can do the transformation
> mechanism which is excelled, omitted, and is added
> and equipped with the module mainly composed of
> the transformation has been adopted. As a result,
> productivity rose, and the weakness of the
> airframe was able to be cancelled. This system is
> liked to the concept of FXA-05D. [It] arrived
> until the latest technology's being turned on, and
> equalling MSZ-006 on the spec. *** [It] thinks and
> the performance which not is is demonstrated with
> the mass production machine like the movement and
> the *long range barrier?* cruise ability and
> <length> thermal power, etc. in the MA form
> especially. The hoop manufacturing cost was still
> expensive (MSZ-006 was higher), the mass
> production plan was interrupted, only one
> experimental machine was sent to Lar Kairam of the
> Londo Bell Corps, and [it] attached to the actual
> combat disposition. [It] took the place of the
> Lieutenant Kayla/Keira Suu though the pilot was
> Captain Aumro Rei.
> translation end--
> the main points:
> 1) the ReGZ has a different(weaker)
> airframe/fuselage(?) and hence the removal of the
> transformation mechanism
> 2) the Back Weapon System allows a transformation
> and also 'strengthens' the airframe
> 3) Back Weapon System is linked to the G-Defensor
> (FXA-05D)
> 4) cost:perf is improvement on ZG, but still too
> expensive for mass production. Note the *long
> range barrier* was my guess at translating to
> characters since Translingo couldn't do it.
> 5) it's official, there was only *one* ReGZ
> I'm not so sure about your first comment about not
> being able to transform back into the MA mode, but
> that really bites if it is true. I might have to
> get the Bandai ReGZ kit which I am sure will have
> more information than the MS Encyclopaedia.

The translation is a bit rough but it's pretty much correct. But for your
information here is my contribution to clarify things...

In Gundam speak 'ki-tai' refers to the whole machine itself (usually MS or MA) not
The RGZ-91 does technically transform to a very limited extent but not in the way
the Z Gundam transforms i.e the transformation system in the ReGZ itself was
simplified and the transformation involves a separate external attachment , the
Back Weapon System. As you can imagine a transforming MS is much more complicated
in design and build then a standard MS, and one of the downsides to the Z Gundam
is that because of the transform ability its body has certain weaknesses making it
more vulnerable to enemy attacks than a non-transforming MS. By removing most of
the transformation ability from the MS itself, not only made it easier to produce
but also eliminated the inherent weaknesses of the Z Gundam design. In the
'tranformed' MA form, its performance abilities are more a kin to
experimental/special prototypes than that of mass produced machines.(Note:The ReGZ
easily outperforms Z Gundam. Also Note:*It's simply long range cruise ability. *)

Despite the modifications the ReGZ was still too costly to produce (albeit much
less than Z Gundam), and the production plan was cancelled. Only the one
experimental machine was put into active service with the Londo Bell aboard the
Lar Kairam.


Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Oct 27 1999 - 07:32:58 JST