Neil Baumgardner (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sat, 02 Oct 1999 12:17:47 -0400
Matt Hanyok wrote:
> > Wow, I've never heard of this before. In what timeframe (months) does
> > this take
> > place? Is this considered cannonical? This would have the Mk II
> > around _four_
> > years before Zeta!
> That really doesn't seem all that surprising. I mean, Logically, the Mk II
> is the next step up from Alex (who, technically, was the next step up from
> the original RX-78). The Alex was being developed in 0080, I would think
> that 3 years later they would have some kind of working prototype for the Mk
> II 178 gundam.
Except that they just had/have the Gundam Development Project of 0083, with
three different Gundam prototypes and afterwards are undergoing a sort of
anti-Gundam sentiment in the Fed./Titan leadership as a result of the Delaz
Having the Mk II in 0083/84 would suggest that the Gundam Development
Project and Mk II development were conducted near simultaneously.
> Although, having one four years before Zeta, it kind of makes
> you wonder why there weren't more than three of 'em in the series.
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Oct 03 1999 - 01:17:51 JST