Neil Baumgardner (
Sat, 02 Oct 1999 12:17:47 -0400

Matt Hanyok wrote:

> > Wow, I've never heard of this before. In what timeframe (months) does
> > this take
> > place? Is this considered cannonical? This would have the Mk II
> > around _four_
> > years before Zeta!
> That really doesn't seem all that surprising. I mean, Logically, the Mk II
> is the next step up from Alex (who, technically, was the next step up from
> the original RX-78). The Alex was being developed in 0080, I would think
> that 3 years later they would have some kind of working prototype for the Mk
> II 178 gundam.

    Except that they just had/have the Gundam Development Project of 0083, with
    three different Gundam prototypes and afterwards are undergoing a sort of
    anti-Gundam sentiment in the Fed./Titan leadership as a result of the Delaz
    Having the Mk II in 0083/84 would suggest that the Gundam Development
    Project and Mk II development were conducted near simultaneously.

> Although, having one four years before Zeta, it kind of makes
> you wonder why there weren't more than three of 'em in the series.


    Neil Baumgardner

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Oct 03 1999 - 01:17:51 JST