Paul Fields (johnny_raiden@hotmail.com)
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 05:15:25 -0400


Actually you wouldn't need too much power if we were
to build Zeon type MS, mostly melee and projectile weapons
mega-beams are the stuff of sci-fi, and until we have equal
power to them, we should stick to the conventional weapons
we know...

Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: Lim Jyue <lim_jyue@pacific.net.sg>
To: <gundam@aeug.org>
Sent: Monday, September 06, 1999 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [gundam] a survey

> At 00:57 09/06/1999 -0400, you wrote:
> >Amateur anwer of the day, Either a US Nuclear Sub, or NASA space
> >probe, however the space probe use decaying nuclear piles not really
> >REACTors. The US Navy toyed with sodium cooled Reators for their
> >subs, and those could reah higher temperatures than water cooled ones
> >so some variant on this could be used for MS, but it'd still be huge.
>
> Yeah, I thought of that, but IIRC, the "boomer" plants are capable
> of power production way over the requirements of the sub.. Assuming we are
> interested only in building a reactor capable of propelling a small
vehicle
> of under 100 tons, is it feasible?
>
> Most MS are under 100 tons, and they don't really produce that
much
> power from their reactor -- I doubt their reactors produce as much power
as
> the nuclear sub's. So.. is it possible to squeeze a conventional (i.e.
> current fission or experimental fusion) reactor into a MS frame?
>
> -------------
> Lim Jyue
> ICQ: 24737555
>
>
> -
> Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
>
>

-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Sep 06 1999 - 18:17:17 JST