 |
 |
||||
|
|
||||
reika (reika@clear.net.nz)
Sun, 25 Jul 1999 20:32:04 +1200
Haneto@aol.com wrote:
Thanks for the post script, now let me comment on this
> You're absolutely correct. I have Beltochika Children and Tomino states in
> the postscript:
>
> "The preliminary scenario was this story, but the group of investors,
> 'Gundam movie project group' had many complaints. The major one being that
> this story portrayed MS negatively. This was actually my intention.
Does this mean to say he dislikes the giant robot genre altogether? I
have heard that this is/was the case.
>... I had to admit to myself that I chased my own dream too much.
Now what is wrong with that Tomino? It's your work after all.
> Second complaint was that 'we do not want to see a married Amuro in a movie'."
would anyone here care? This a shift from what we have assumed on the
list that Belotchika's child was conceived out of wedlock, however
acceptance of this is definitely cultural.
> it must have lots of fighting, enough to gather complaints from the PTA.
I find that rather funny :)
> I did not forget this rule when it came to
> fight scenes, but as for the characters, Gundam is a story about evolving
> humans so the end result becomes 'denial of things', 'denial of machines =
> denial of MS'. This is the meaning of 'denial of Amuro's marriage' "
>
> "What will happen then? There will be no next Gundam. The small success
> I've achieved by creating Gundam will also be denied."
No wonder Tomino has been so pissed at Sunrise and Bandai et al. I am
surprised that he did F91 after all this.
--
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
$B!!!!(B $B7/$OL$$@K\Ev$NGO</$OCN$l$J$$(B
Michael Ip
reika@clear.net.nz
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Gulf/8013/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Jul 25 1999 - 17:34:51 JST