Raitenshi Veilchen (raitenshi@hotmail.com)
Thu, 03 Jun 1999 02:47:53 GMT


>From: Alfred Urrutia <Alfred.Urrutia@disney.com>
>Reply-To: gundam@aeug.org
>To: gundam@aeug.org
>Subject: Re: [gundam] Gundam VS. Valkyries
>Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 19:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
>
>On Jun 2, 10:21pm, BlazeEagle@aol.com wasted bandwidth discussing:
> > Subject: Re: [gundam] Gundam VS. Valkyries
> > In a message dated 6/2/1999 10:16:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > Flanker358@AOL.COM writes:
> >
> > > *Groans*...Please Please don't begain this again....last year there
>was a
> > big
> > >
> > > aurgument on the list on the same topic....I for one think that's
> > > enough...it's like comparing apple with oranges...
> >
> > I don't mean to complain, but I agree. Jeez, this could go on for weeks
>and
> > months. I remember that argument from last year. It went on for a long
>time.
> > Valkyries and Gundam's are different, but are sorta, if its stretched,
>are
> > similar, but barely. Comparing Gundams is one thing, but this is like
> > comparing totally different dimension's to one another.
> >
> > Aaron
>
>
>No doubt, a pointless argument and I apologize. My only thought was that
>you *can* compare, if you feel like it, on a technical level. On a
>magical,
>ESP, hero-gets-away-with-anything level, not really. I mean, it's not a
>question of are mechs from one series different or not but a question of
>how would they rate head to head? Sort of like how would the Hood and the
>Yamato do against each other? Both in WWII but they never saw each other.
>Or the Bismarck and the Iowa. Pointless, but very doable.

Yeah... I agree. But it's not that pointless, you know.

-
Veilchen the Thunderangel
http://raitenshi.electricport.com/

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Jun 03 1999 - 11:48:05 JST