Wed, 02 Jun 1999 00:19:36 +1200
Raitenshi Veilchen wrote:
> What exactly is a Newtype? How would you define it?
Whilst othern have come with a more politically correct definition for a
Newtype, allow me to take a more cynical approach. Although previous
answers are also generally correct (I say generally because as we know
there is no concrete definition for a Newtype), there is one thing which
has been omitted: Newtypes typically exhibit some sort relationship
Clear example are Amuro, Quess, Judo and Camille who was always
rebellious. Hamaan and Char were a manipulative, and it has been
questionable was to whether Char was a paedophile. Rosamia had multiple
personalities (albiet by artificial means) and Scirocco and were just
However not all Newtypeas are like this. I felt Seabook Arno was
okay...and cetianly Lalah Sun, Mirai and Four Murasame had more pleasant
I think it was Tomino's intention to make Newtypes not glamourous, and
they have severe personality faults which IMHO, far outweigh their gifts.
Personally I say screw the Newtypes.
hmmm, I wonder if anyone has written a thesis on Tomino's works and
literature, it might shed some light on the Newtype thing.
-- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ all opinions expressed herein are my own and not those of my employers, who are appalled Michael Ip email@example.com http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Gulf/8013/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
- Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Jun 01 1999 - 21:15:58 JST