Tue, 11 May 1999 21:29:27 EDT
In a message dated 5/11/1999 8:05:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> Thanks for the clarification. I'm honestly getting pretty bored with
> worst-case-scenario rants; thus far, the actual show is quite serious and
> technologically consistent. (Of course, I haven't seen the resurrection of
> the Capule yet...)
> > Hey, that explanation makes alot of sense, I can deal with that! Or
> >perhaps the generator has variable power settings, depending on the power
> >_requirement_. Or perhaps that's just it's average power, it can drop down
> >lower for 'idling' or increase for "Full Combat Power" etc...
> It's probably meant as an estimate, to underscore that nobody has access
> to the blueprints and manufacturer's specs for this thing. In fact, nobody
> even knows its name - I'm curious to see when, if ever, a character will
> refer to it as the Turn A Gundam. Maybe there's a name tag on it someplace.
> But I'm probably wasting my time discussing this stuff. It seems like the
> list members have pretty much made up their minds to piss all over the
Yep, I say, give the show a chance guys. I like the Turn A itself, it is sort
of ugly, but I like it. I, for one, will give the show a chance and everyone
else, should at least try to do the same.
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed May 12 1999 - 10:30:09 JST