Tue, 11 May 1999 21:29:27 EDT

In a message dated 5/11/1999 8:05:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, writes:

> Thanks for the clarification. I'm honestly getting pretty bored with
> worst-case-scenario rants; thus far, the actual show is quite serious and

Me too.

> technologically consistent. (Of course, I haven't seen the resurrection of
> the Capule yet...)
> > Hey, that explanation makes alot of sense, I can deal with that! Or
> >perhaps the generator has variable power settings, depending on the power
> >_requirement_. Or perhaps that's just it's average power, it can drop down
> >lower for 'idling' or increase for "Full Combat Power" etc...
> It's probably meant as an estimate, to underscore that nobody has access
> to the blueprints and manufacturer's specs for this thing. In fact, nobody
> even knows its name - I'm curious to see when, if ever, a character will
> refer to it as the Turn A Gundam. Maybe there's a name tag on it someplace.
> But I'm probably wasting my time discussing this stuff. It seems like the
> list members have pretty much made up their minds to piss all over the

Yep, I say, give the show a chance guys. I like the Turn A itself, it is sort
of ugly, but I like it. I, for one, will give the show a chance and everyone
else, should at least try to do the same.

Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed May 12 1999 - 10:30:09 JST