Lim Jyue (email@example.com)
Mon, 03 May 1999 13:25:53 +0800
At 07:35 5/2/99 -0700, you wrote:
>well as space. Unlike the Jions, the Feds play it safe and smart and make
>sure their MS work well on land as well as space and standardized their
Actually, I think both ideas have merit. After all, the extra
verniers are useless (well, almost =) on land, so why not remove it and slap
on more armour/ammo, gear, etc? After all, ground combat will, IMO, consume
more ammo and result in more hits than space combat.
> You've got the nomenclature confused again. The Commando is the GM-G,
>the 8MST GM is the GM-[G]. The GM-G is strictly a colony-fighting MS,
OIC! =) Let's just keep it as Command(o) and [G], shall we?
>than any Gundam of that era!) The GM-GS also sports TWENTY TONS more fuel
TWENTY TONS? But that will reduce it's thrust-to-weight
tremendously, even with the additional thrusters.. while acceleration isn't
the be-all and end-all in MS combat, such a sluggish performance can be
deadly.. And that will put the GS in the same weight class as the Zaku FZ,
about 70++ tons, right?
>wager that the GM-G would have rather poor space-combat power compared to
>the GM-GS, but it would probably be on par with the Gundam..... certainly
>WAY better than the GM-[G] which would be utterly helpless in space!
Which Gundam? the 78 is developed for use in space, right? the NT is
shown engaging in a simulated fight in space, so we can safely bet that it's
space capable too. Unless you are talking about the 78G, which wasn't
designed for that anyway..
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon May 03 1999 - 14:21:44 JST