Chien Ting Chin (email@example.com)
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 00:17:57 -0500
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Mark Simmons wrote:
> is the reason why Sunrise now objects so strongly to the "UNT Spacy"
> term. Unlike the United Nations, the Earth Federation is a fusion of
> previously independent nations, not an alliance between them.
I've always wonder what this really means. EF sounds like a stronger
(i.e. more centralized) union than UN. Would EU be comparable? I would
guess not. Since (sadly) a real nation is often defined by its military
forces, the EF should be considered one nation, since there's one and only
one well-defined army structure (as opposed to the ill-defined UN
Peace-Keeper troops). So the comparison could be similar to the bigger
countries of today: USA, Canada or China, with a centralized government
(that also happens to recuit and run the armed forces) overseeing
provinces/states that are self-governing in local politics.
Of course I am really posing a question: is the above somewhat sensible?
But really I don't see how it can be otherwise. You need an army
structure with a clear chain of command to fight an organized enemy
(Zeon). Someone has to control this army structure, and whoever this
(person or committee or whatever) is, s/he/it must be damn close to the
true power of the whole EF.
CHIN, Chien Ting
Dept of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
... o O *
Man is a bubble
Gundam Mailing List Archives are available at http://gundam.aeug.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed Mar 03 1999 - 14:24:54 JST